Our technical SEO wizard, Tom Williams, gives us the top updates from the world of SEO. Learn more.
Have Google Search Console reports changed?
In an article on data anomalies in Search Console published by Google earlier this week, it was announced that changes have been made to reports to “cover a smaller number of pages in order to provide better performance.” The reports impacted include AMP, Mobile Usability, Speed and all rich results.
So, what’s changed? In his article on Google Search Console reports, Barry Schwartz (@rustybrick) notes how:
“Some of the reports are now reporting on a smaller number of pages…specifically, Google is looking at fewer of your pages for generating the AMP, Mobile Usability, Speed, all rich result reports. This change happened on April 12, 2020.”
In the same article from Google, it was explained that search results are not impacted by this change. As such, you may see a decrease in the number of items and pages tracked in these reports. This does not affect search results, only the data reporting in Search Console.
So, if you notice changes in the AMP, Mobile Usability, Speed or all rich results within Google Search Console, this may be why. It’s unlikely to be anything to do with any changes you have made to your site.
Google gets pickier about showing rich results
On April 20th, Google’s Web Master Trends Analyst John Mueller (@JohnMu) tweeted about how when search results become overloaded with rich results of any kind, Google’s engineers may decide to show fewer.
In his article on this topic, Barry Schwartz notes how Google have made similar decisions multiple times over the years, deciding not to show rich results for all sites that have implemented it. For example, in 2016, Google announced that it doesn’t want to clutter the results with too many rich results (SERoundTable).
What do you think? Have you noticed a difference in your rich results? Tweet us @clickthrough.
- Think twice about fragment identifiers. Fragment identifiers point to subsections of a given page, not necessarily a different page. Splitt explains that “fragments aren’t meant to point to different content, crawlers ignore them; they just pretend that the fragments don’t exist.”
If you’d like to find out more about what’s hot off the SEO press, get in touch today. Or you can tweet me at @tommy_iv.